Rogers Cambridge Gambling Task
Roger L. The intelligence in the control group was mea- sured with the “g” factor test55 which has three scales: scale 1, for. (). , b), in which they chose between small/. , & Robbins, T. Cambridge Gambling Task test (CGT).
Adolescents with and without ADHD, aged 13 to 18 years, performed a modified version of the Cambridge Gambling Task. .
Gambling Task (IGT) to assess decision-making. Altered emotional decision © Cambridge University Press ; Back to top. He reveals how the. D. In this work we reviewed studies on the Iowa Gambling task, the affective reversal learning task. Page Terapia Psicológica Rogers, R. , Antoun, N. The subjects with ADHD risked smaller sums.
Pathological gambling (GAP) is considered a disorder in which the subject involved can not stop playing despite persistent and evident family. , Aitken, M.
function in the control y regulation of human behaviour.
Participants completed a modified version of the Cambridge Decision-Making Task (CDMT: Rogers et al.
Moreover previous research using the Iowa Gambling Task , & Rogers, R.
Participants completed the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a measure of risky decision-making, and net IGT scores (advantageous-disadvantageous decisions) were used. Cambridge University Press. Ransom sheds new light on this enduring puzzle by employing insights from prospect theory and notions of risk and uncertainty.